Articles delegate-en/5011-5017 (12Feb02)

Articles delegate-en/5011-5017 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119

[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]

range 5011 - 5017 digest:

delegate: socksmux doesn't work when running in background
02/02-11:46 . 5011 Renaud Bompuis <psmjqbdyi-6xickez5ktfr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [114]: Hi, I am trying to make delegate work as a multiplexed SOCKS tunnel, as described here: http://www.delegate.org/delegate/SOCKS/sockmux/ Basically, I want to use 2 servers to relay proxy data efficie
02/02-22:04 . 5012 feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [40]: Hi, I could reproduce the problem which seems a bug that have been introduced in 9.9.0-pre2. Unfortunately there seems no workaround by command options to escape the problem. A possible way to solve
02/03-11:53 . 5013 Renaud Bompuis <psmjqbdyi-6xickez5ktfr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [68]: Hi Yutaka, thanks for the reply. I compiled delegate 9.9.8-pre20 but it doen's work in sockmux mode, I get this error message: (UNIX) 10:44:57.405 [11696] ## sox_connects: Not Available in the Sourc
02/03-17:42 . 5014 feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [101]: Hi, Sorry, I'm reminded that SockMux is restricted in source code distributions after the DeleGate/9.8.6. You can use "-f" instead of "-v" to redirect the logging output to the logfile. The max. par
Fwd: LDAP proxy with search filter
02/06-15:40 . 5015 "Sunil S" <pv4iabdyi-6xickez5ktfr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [137]: Dear Yutaka, Request your attention to my earlier mail (below). Could you tell me if it is possible to apply filters in a proxy ldap situation? Regards Sunil Dear Yutaka, Greetings! When I try to us
02/06-17:16 . 5016 feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [20]: Hi, Mabe the answer is NO. As long as I remember, the implementation of LDAP in DeleGate is very simple one just to do proxying by switching a target LDAP server (with MOUNT parameters) for a baseOb
02/06-17:44 . 5017 "Sunil S" <pv4iabdyi-6xickez5ktfr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [124]: Thanks, Yutaka! While the preferred tool is the Swiss Army Knife (delegate), we are currently working around the problem with OpenLDAP META back-end. Regards -- Sunil Hi, Mabe the answer is NO. As l

[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]

Generated:06/26 11:26:57 (1 sec) Expires:06/26 17:26:56