Articles delegate-en/4895-4920 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4895 - 4920   digest:
FTP port bounce prevention
  09/01-08:27 . 4895  Jacob Lundberg <pdeiqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [32]
  Hi, One of the ways people try to prevent ftp port bounce attacks and probing is to require in the FTP server that the PORT command must specify the same IP as the originator of the control channel.
  09/05-00:14 . 4896  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [54]
  Hi Jake, Even if PORT is turned off, clients can establish active connections by using EPRT as "EPRT |1|10.20.30.40|12345|" for example. Thank you for your description of the problem. Maybe I should
  09/05-11:23 . 4897  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [132]
  Hi, The modification in 9.9.8-pre13 for all of the above extensions is a little large. The enclosed one is just for rejecting FTP Bounce without configurations. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato, CSDP
  09/07-05:19 . 4898  Jacob Lundberg <pdeiqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [73]
  Hi, Thanks for your quick reply; this is why DeleGate is awesome. I am testing 9.9.8-pre14 right now and it looks very good! -Jacob Jacob Lundberg Director, IT Services pdeiqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/11-12:12 . 4899  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [57]
  I am trying to implement PAM authentication and authorization to access ssh services on specific hosts: specifically, the Employees group should have full access to the local network, while the Cons
  09/11-15:27 . 4900  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [113]
  Hi, If your solution is correct, you should see it working and I don't have advices to make. By the way, did you get a way to use RADIUS via PAM? If so, the description about what you did on which p
  09/11-18:27 . 4901  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [55]
  Maybe the safest configuration in your usage is restricting the target servers available for "consultants" who are identified as A) any users making accesses from "consultants' hosts" or B) users au
SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure
  09/13-23:07 . 4902  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [854]
  Hello all ... First, i'd like to know if Delegat is able to handle a sort of SIP proxy. Usually I use SSH to tunnel my datas, but SSH seems no to handle UDP request. This is what I would like to set
UDP over TCP (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/14-13:50 . 4903  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [31]
  DeleGate does not support SIP (yet). Thre are several ways to convey UDP over TCP using a pair of DeleGate. The simplest one is using a pair of DeleGates for UDPrelay. hostA$ delegated -P2000 SERVER
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/15-07:58 . 4904  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [91]
  I am trying this syntax: delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks AUTHORIZER=-pam:http,ftp:192.168.255.0/24:* REMITTABLE="tcprelay/80" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/22" HOSTLIST="ConsServ:/10.80.80.100" HOSTLIST="ConsC
  09/15-11:27 . 4905  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [37]
  A user of a command shell is expected to know what "!" means when it used in a command line, and how to escape the interpretation of "!" by a shell (using "\"). Just see "man bash" and search the wo
HTTP proxy for Miranda without chunked encoding (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/15-12:04 . 4906  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [41]
  It seems that, at least in older versions, "Miranda" does not support the "chunked" encoding which is mandatory for the HTTP/1.1 clients. Here is a workaround by DeleGate to cope with such case: HTT
  09/16-03:28 . 4907  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [61]
  Thanks a lot for all those informations. I'll try to dig it at work tommorow. Thomas --- Original Message --- From: "Yutaka Sato" <feedback@delegate.org> To: <feedback@delegate.org> Cc: <peyjqbdyi-d
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/16-07:55 . 4908  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [71]
  I am trying this command (I am still in testing mode, that's why I am not scripting): delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks AUTHORIZER=-pam OWNER="root" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/80" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/22" HOS
  09/16-10:44 . 4909  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
  This must be one of followings: REMITTABLE="tcprelay/80" REMITTABLE="+,tcprelay/22" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/80,tcprelay/22" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/{80,22}" A strange "/" in the second field of HOSTLIST d
HTTP proxy for Miranda without chunked encoding (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/16-16:52 . 4910  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [72]
  Hello I tried those two : dg9_9_7.exe -P8889 SERVER=http RES_WAIT=0 ADMIN=AZER@AZER..FR PERMIT=*:*:* HTTPCONF=bugs:no-chunked -v > Does not work dg9_9_7.exe -P8889 SERVER=http RES_WAIT=0 ADMIN=AZER@
Fw: HTTP proxy for Miranda without chunked encoding (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/16-21:02 . 4911  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [87]
  I got a mail delivery failure, so I send this mail once more. Thomas --- Original Message --- From: "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> To: <feedback@delegate.org> Sent: Thursday, S
UDP over TCP (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/23-21:00 . 4913  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [74]
  I did try what you told me to, but it does not work. The UDP relay, does not transform packets to TCP one (wireshark is only showing udp packet sent) So I tried something else : On the actual comput
  09/23-21:14 . 4914  "ZaMotH" <peyjqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [103]
  Ok I did make it work. It was not working because, on my Qteclient, I put 127.0.0.1 as server ... and SIP protocol seems to analyze the requested server. So I told Qteclient to use freephonie.net as
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/24-07:20 . 4915  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [107]
  I. I am attempting to make user groups work: delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks AUTHORIZER=-pam/delegated OWNER="root" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/{80,443,22}" HOSTLIST="ConsServ1:10.10.80.100" HOSTLIST="ConsSe
  09/24-12:34 . 4916  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [24]
  - As long as I knonw, there is no parameter with name "USERLIST". - "ConServ1" in the above PERMIT is not defined in any HOSTLIST. - "ConsServ1", "ConsServ2" and "ConsServ3" are defined but not used
UDP over TCP (Re: SIP proxy possibilities and MSN failure)
  09/24-15:13 . 4917  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [32]
  I don't believe that you could make it work as follows: At least it should have been like this: client-side: delegated SERVER=sockmux://remote-host:5678 PORT=1234/udp remote-host: delegated SERVER=s
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/27-11:45 . 4918  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [47]
  Sorry for the obvious spelling mistake with ConsServ1, but I have been putting the syntax through its paces by testing (successfully) giving different users access to different hosts on the local su
conditional mount on arbitrary protocol
  09/29-01:48 . 4919  "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <pg4jqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [52]
  Hello Yutaka, I played today with delegate trying to figure if I can use it to route some PostgreSQL clients based on their database connection. meaning: client want to connect to database "db1" ->
Does Delegate support user-based access lists, with those users authenticated by a RADIUS server?
  09/30-07:45 . 4920  Vietnhi Phuvan <pcijqbdyi-dwslbww4kp6r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [59]
  I created a user group using HOSTLIST (syntax below) and tried to make it work, with zero success: delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks AUTHORIZER=-pam/delegated OWNER="root" REMITTABLE="tcprelay/{80,443,2
Empty-Articles = [4912]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:01/22 10:54:11 (2 sec) Expires:01/22 16:54:09 @_@V