Articles delegate-en/4470-4500 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4470 - 4500   digest:
Question regarding delegate SERVER=exec parameter
  05/27-07:25 . 4470  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guilherme_V=EAnere?= <> [20]
___ Hello, Is there any restriction on using SERVER=exec as parameter for delegate? When I run it with parameters below, i got error: ../linux-dg -P9999 SERVER=exec ADMIN=-root@localhost
  05/28-07:13 . 4471 (Yutaka Sato) [52]
___ Hi, You are right. It should work as you expect with your configuration. It has become disabled since 9.8.6-pre1 and can be fixed as the enclosed patch. I uploaded 9.9.4-pre3 including the patch. <U
NAT odst available to scripts on DeleGate
  05/28-11:31 . 4472  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guilherme_V=EAnere?= <> [44]
___ Hello Mr Yutaka, Thank you for your reply to my inquiry about SERVER=exec parameter. It worked as expected. I'm afraid I need to bother you a little more. As I explained before, I'm trying to use De
Delegate: how to customize login banner?
  05/28-16:38 . 4473  Andrea `Zuse' Balestrero - YouUs HelpDesk Sorgenia <> [40]
___ When I start a connection with my FTP(S) client, Delegate shows me the following banner: 220- localhost PROXY-FTP server (DeleGate/9.9.2) ready. 220- @ @ 220- ( - ) { DeleGate/9.9.2 (March 15, 2009)
NAT odst available to scripts on DeleGate
  05/28-18:07 . 4474 (Yutaka Sato) [68]
___ Hi, Questions on advanced usages of DeleGate, as yours, are very helpful and welcome. But those in anonymous mails are treated in low priority. Although I don't like to know personal information of
Delegate: how to customize login banner?
  05/28-18:22 . 4475 (Yutaka Sato) [51]
___ Hi, The template of the banner is at src/builtin/mssgs/file/ftp-banner.dhtml as this: ${host.clif} PROXY-FTP server (DeleGate/${ver}) ready. @ @ ( - ) { ${verdate} } ${copyright} WWW: ${homepage} Yo
NAT odst available to scripts on DeleGate
  05/29-01:57 . 4476  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guilherme_V=EAnere?= <> [105]
___ Hello Mr Yutaka, Thank you very much, it worked perfectly. I'm sorry for not introducing myself properly before. I'm Brazillian, and I work for a technical school developing trainings in advanced to
ASN.1 custom filter
  06/02-20:38 . 4477  <> [75]
___ Hi, I'm still learning to use Delegated. I was wondering if I understood the help correctly: with a FTOSV filter (let's say pointing to a perl script) I could filter data coming from 1 client to dis
FTP client to implicit FTPS server
  06/04-01:08 . 4478  Marvin Tapessur <> [63]
___ Yutaka, The STLS="-fsv,im=0.5" breaks 'normal' ftp connections using PORT. PASV connections work just fine. Any thought? Rgds, Marvin
  06/04-03:32 . 4479 (Yutaka Sato) [106]
___ Hi, It should be "im0.5", not "im=0.5". And I can't reproduce the problem with the following test. delegated -P9999 SERVER=ftp STLS=-fsv,im=0.5 -fv -vd CACHE=no FTPCONF=nopasv:sv 06/04 03:26:44.67 [
  06/04-03:40 . 4480  Marvin <> [158]
___ Yep, that was a typo on my end. I have it correct in my config though. This is what I use: delegated -P21 STLS="-fsv,im0.5" ADMIN=bla@bla.. If I remove the STLS all together active ftp works just fi
  06/04-03:49 . 4481 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Comparing and seeing the difference between your LOGFILEs with and without STLS will give us hints. As shown by my LOGFILE, I could not reproduce your problem. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato
  06/04-03:50 . 4482  Marvin <> [212]
___ Below the logging of a failed active connection: 06/03 20:46:08.50 [7541] 1+0: -- Fork(OnetimeServer): 7522 -> 7541 06/03 20:46:08.52 [7541] 1+0: (0) accepted [48] -@[]eupdwsappb308.acm
  06/04-03:58 . 4483  Marvin <> [95]
___ And this is one of a succesful connection with STLS removed. I'm using version 9.9.4-pre5. Thanks for your help. 06/03 20:54:40.11 [7774] 2+0: -- Fork(OnetimeServer): 7765 -> 7774 06/03 20:54:40.11
  06/05-17:55 . 4484 (Yutaka Sato) [85]
___ Hi, I can't see why this problem is described as: What does "normal ftp connection" mean ? First I thought it as the non-SSL connection, but your broken PORT connection seems SSL based. How "PASV" w
ASN.1 custom filter
  06/05-18:41 . 4485 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Hi, With "iptables" on Linux or "ipfw" on BSD, you can forward TCP connections via DeleGate to the original destination host (server) with "odst.-" as follows: SERVER=tcprelay://dst.- Cheers, Yutaka
STLS=-mitm parameter and HTTPS sniffing
  06/05-19:00 . 4486 (Yutaka Sato) [41]
___ Hi, STLS=mitm is available only in the binary distribution of DeleGate. <URL:> STLS=mitm does more than decryption/encryption of SSL. Acting as a
FTP client to implicit FTPS server
  06/05-19:11 . 4487  Marvin <> [103]
___ I see what you mean. I need to connect through active ftp to this server however it seems that this server also accepts ftps connections throwing delegate off. Is there a way to force a ftp instead
  06/05-20:34 . 4488 (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ Hi, What is the server? You can restrict the application of STLS as follows: STLS="-fsv:ftp:!specific-server" If the firewall just translates addresses but not ports, you can specify the IP-address
ie8 with ftp proxy
  06/16-18:17 . 4489  rewat pathumthawornsakul <> [15]
___ IE8 cant access to ftp server with delegated ftp proxy. How to fix it ?
IPv6 SRCIF support
  06/25-17:28 . 4490  Chris Murton <> [85]
___ Hi, I was wondering if there are plans to support the setting of the source IPv6 address of outgoing traffic from Delegate (as per SRCIF for IPv4 connections)? Thanks, Chris
  06/26-02:26 . 4491 (Yutaka Sato) [17]
___ Hi, I'm not so sure but SRCIF seems supporting IPv6 already... Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Scienc
  06/26-03:16 . 4492  Chris Murton <> [27]
___ Hi Yutaka, How about in a condition where the proxy has both IPv4 and IPv6 networks attached to it, and you want to specify a different outgoing source address for both v4 and v6? :) Thanks, Chris
  06/26-03:40 . 4493 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Hi, You can specify multiple SRCIF conditionally on the address family of the destination using a pseudo hostname "_4" and "_6" for IPv4/IPv6 respectively. Thus it could be as this for example: SRCI
  06/26-03:57 . 4494  Chris Murton <> [29]
___ Hi Yutaka, That's working perfectly, thanks for your help! Chris
  06/26-04:08 . 4495 (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi Chris, Since I have no real experience with IPv6, feedbacks like yours are very welcome. Yutaka
match for X-Request
  07/01-03:07 . 4496  Jens-Erik Hansen <> [34]
___ Hello Yutaka, I currently try to match for X-Request or X-Request-Original in an xml-secure stream. A very basic CFI-script like this one: Header-Filter: -tee-n-v /dev/tty shows the following result
  07/01-12:29 . 4497 (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi Jens, You are right. Selecting a FTOCL filter over HTTP with CFI's "X-Request" condition has been disabled since 9.2.3-pre4, in which conditional CFI for FTOCL was modified to reduce the overhead
  07/01-21:51 . 4498  Jens-Erik Hansen <> [64]
___ Hello Yutaka, thank you very much for your reply. Today I tried delegate 9.9.4-pre9 and I made some extraordinary experiences trying to accomplish my task which leads me to the assumption that I mad
  07/03-03:33 . 4499 (Yutaka Sato) [89]
___ Hi Jens, The following test works with 9.9.4-pre9 but not work with 9.9.4-pre8. [url.cfi] X-Request-URL: /test/test.txt Header-Filter: -tee-n-v ---(1) without SSL [server] delegated -P9999 -fv SERVE
DeleGate: question regarding the PROTOLOG parameters
  07/03-22:38 . 4500  "Kopplinger, Andreas" <> [81]
___ Yutaka Sato, I have a question regarding the PROTOLOG parameters. At the moment, the startscript contains the following: PROTOLOG='${LOGDIR}/Protolog_${PORT}.${PROTO}[date+.%d]' It would like to use
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:02/24 05:49:38 (2 sec) Expires:02/24 11:49:36 @_@V