Articles delegate-en/3780-3810 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 3780 - 3810   digest:
Can I force ssl version 3.0 only?
  06/27-00:38 . 3780 (Yutaka Sato) [190]
___ Joe, I think this message (from the SSLway process id 605) is not a part of the session logged as follows (with the SSLway process id 613). Running DeleGate with SSLway with "-vd" option instead of
Problem with Content-Encoding
  06/27-20:29 . 3781  "Bieber, Sebastian" <> [988]
___ Hello! After trying for some time to solve the problem on my own without any success, i'd like to ask for your kind help on this matter... For authenticated and encrypted remote access to a local we
Can I force ssl version 3.0 only?
  06/28-00:37 . 3782  "Joe Moore" <> [207]
___ Yutaka, I recompiled with the new sslway.c and ran with the "-vd" option. I can now connect with the config: STLS="fcl,sslway -no_ssl2" -P23 -vd SERVER=telnet://ss922 CACHE=no RES_WAIT=0 The log of
Problem with Content-Encoding
  06/28-01:49 . 3783 (Yutaka Sato) [65]
___ Hi, Ooops... It seems that I disabled it in DeleGate/8.6.0 (4 years ago) in which I fixed it to cope with "Accept-Encoding: x-gzip" ... ! 8.6.0 030514 http.c: fixed to echo Accept-Encoding:x-gzip to
Can I force ssl version 3.0 only?
  06/28-02:47 . 3784 (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Joe, I ment the "-vd" option in TLSCONF as I saw "TSLCONF=-vs" in your configuration in /usr/sbin/delegated.conf in your miniBSD. But it is no more necessary because your problem seems fixed. You ne
Problem with Content-Encoding
  06/28-13:44 . 3785  "Bieber, Sebastian" <> [131]
___ Hi! First, let me say "thanks a lot" for your quick answer. Applying the patch to filter.c solved the problem described - now content is compressed before sent to the client. Unfortunately, with the
  06/28-16:04 . 3786 (Yutaka Sato) [90]
___ Hi, Ooooops... Your modification will be enough for most situtaion, but I should fix it as the enclosed patch to cope with "x-gzip" (which might be obsolete) and to prepare to cope with "deflate". C
  06/28-20:16 . 3787  "Bieber, Sebastian" <> [117]
___ Hi, I just applied your patches to the original 9.5.6 version. Don't know if this is of any interest to you, but i can confirm that the patched version works perfecly! Thanks again... So long, Sebas
  06/28-22:25 . 3788 (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ Hi, Maybe you know it is not perfect because it does not apply gzip to the data to which CFIscript is applied. The gzip for HTTP-repsonse is disabled when a FTOCL filter (a filter for the response d
POP user with @ in name
  07/05-22:09 . 3789  "Tobias Haecker (T.O.)" <> [44]
___ Hey there, I cannot get delegate to work as a POP proxy with the following problem: Server is Username is popuser@example.. I tried: * OK localhost Proxy IMAP4 server DeleGate/
Restrict the FTP username
  07/06-07:06 . 3790  Kevin Richter <> [22]
___ Hi, I am using delegate as a FTP proxy and I was wondering if/how it is possible to limit the login to those users, who use the "user@hostname" syntax as username - and supply a valid password? At t
POP user with @ in name
  07/06-16:35 . 3791 (Yutaka Sato) [38]
___ Hi, First of all, you are talking with a IMAP server as the greeting message shows. These pattern work for POP but not for IMAP. This pattern should work both for POP and IMAP. You need to talk with
Restrict the FTP username
  07/06-17:48 . 3792 (Yutaka Sato) [61]
___ Hi, Basically, there are two ways for proxying FTP by DeleGate as follows: 1) by extended user name USER user@host PASS pass 2) by extended path name USER user PASS pass CWD //host This is the reaso
Tunnel for LDAP and POP3S
  07/10-20:49 . 3793  Martin Vetter <> [79]
___ hi, I'm playing around with DeleGate. now I ran into two problems: (1) LDAP forwarding doesn't process simple LDAP auth password? first I start: delegated -f -v -P10389 SERVER=ldap then I do somethi
Cannot get https-http gateway to work under windows
  07/13-18:42 . 3794  "Knut Borchart" <> [37]
___ Hi, i am trying to use delegate as a https gateway to a http only server. Unfortunately i am running into problems. This is what i tried to achieve: Clients are usually connecting to loadbalancer ht
Tunnel for LDAP and POP3S
  07/13-23:48 . 3795 (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ Hi, So far, STLS=mitm has been implemented just for HTTPS/SSL. So you need to specify it as follows for other protocols: FCL=sslway FSV=sslway And the condition attached to your SERVER parameter see
  07/14-03:29 . 3796 (Yutaka Sato) [59]
___ Martin, I'll make it (STLS=mitm for POP3S) be "supported" in the next release (9.6.3-pre2) with the modification as the enclosed patch. With the patch it'll work like your original configuration as
Cannot get https-http gateway to work under windows
  07/15-20:20 . 3797 (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi, Which version of Windows are you using? Your log seems to show that a socket is not inherited from the parent process to a child process, which might be possible on non WinNT (as Win95/98/Me). O
DeleGate Q
  07/25-02:25 . 3798  "Alexander Sokolow" <> [17]
___ I have some Questions... Does DeleGate Windows version have similar functions that Linux version? Where i can download webinterface for DeleGate Windows?
  07/26-06:49 . 3799 (Yutaka Sato) [20]
___ The "Windows version" of DeleGate consists of the "Unix version" with some stabs to emulate Unix primitives on Windows, so they have almost the same functionalities each other. If you think the "Lin
delegate9.6.3-pre5 & IPv6
  07/27-22:09 . 3800  Tero Pelander <> [46]
___ IPv6 problems in delegate9.6.3-pre5 Problem 1: Can't use ipv6 dns servers. Example: first one works ok, second one fails to contact dns server ../delegated -v -P__:3129 SERVER=http RESOLV=dns RES_NS
  07/28-11:19 . 3801 (Yutaka Sato) [108]
___ Hi, It is because the socket of DeleGate to communicate with DNS servers (resolvers) is hard coded to be in IPv4. In the next release (9.6.3-pre6) I'll modify it as the enclosed patch to cope with a
DeleGate/9.6.3 (BETA) -- fixes for frozen gzip and SSL threads
  08/08-13:50 . 3802 (Yutaka Sato) [68]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.6.3 (BETA) -- fixes for frozen gzip and SSL threads This release includes important fixes for proble
Multiple POP alternatively
  08/11-02:06 . 3803  Eric Binger <> [84]
___ Good Morning. We have 2 pop servers (and more in a near future) * each one has an equal MX DNS weight * password are synchronized so emails come alternatively on these servers (SMTP), who are locate
  08/11-02:50 . 3804 (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, If you mean those POP servers are completely synchronized and equivalent about the contents (i.e. the set of users and spools), then you will be able to unify them in the DNS level, or using the
Delegate question: Application gateway
  08/14-22:51 . 3805  qriff <> [9]
___ I would like to know if it would be possible to use your Delegate to provide access to a website using reverse-cookies. To be more specific: The proxy would direct users to one webserver and get a c
Logging of load balancer pings
  08/21-22:17 . 3806  "Scott Lambdin" <> [53]
___ Hi - Is there some way to tell delegate to stop logging the connections from the load balancers? I'm not finding it. They look like this. 08/21 06:11:37.85 [17521] 37+20: (0) accepted [69] -@[1.1.1.
  08/23-03:05 . 3807 (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Hi, I don't know what you mean by "load balancers" and whether there are clients other than the "load balancerts", but anyway you can suppress logging for any clients with the command line option -v
  08/23-04:15 . 3808  "Scott Lambdin" <> [112]
___ Thanks - that cut it back to just two lines being logged for each connection. The delegate servers are a clustered pair and the load balancer is what decides which server to send each particular con
  08/23-10:28 . 3809 (Yutaka Sato) [102]
___ Hi, At least when I introduced the conditional parameter with "(condition)" prefix in DeleGate/8.2.0, it might have been useful for debugging to see how it is working. But it is not necessary now an
Delegate as LDAP-to-LDAPS proxy
  08/26-04:46 . 3810  Kevin Richter <> [49]
___ Hi, thanks for a second time for this great piece of software. Today I tried out delegate as ldap-to-ldaps proxy. After one hour for reading manual and building the config everything works :) Now I
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:01/18 17:36:43 (1 sec) Expires:01/18 23:36:42 @_@V