Article delegate-en/3441 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate (Re: STLS=fsv for SOCKS)
03 Aug 2006 01:55:51 GMT (Yutaka Sato)
The DeleGate Project


In message <_A3440@delegate-en.ML_> on 08/03/06(02:09:09)
you Martin Papadopoulos <> wrote:
 |i was looking for a way to do user+password authentication on a
 |generalist, sockmux or socks delegate.
 |for now i used as best practice an SSL-certificate which on the server
 |side was checked with
 |the -Vrfy parameter. the reason for this is simple , as the server is
 |public accessible, and i dont want any unauthorized access
 |to arbitrary servers.
 |so is there a chance of having authorization on master and sockmux
 |protocol ?

You can use SSL-certificate for MASTER ans SockMux too if you connect
between DeleGate with SSLway.
You can use AUTHORIZER and MYAUTH for the chaining of DeleGate by MASTER
as this for example:

 % delegated -P8888 FCL=sslway SERVER=delegate AUTHORIZER="-list{user:pass}"
 % delegated -P8080 FSV=sslway SERVER=http MASTER=host:8888 MYAUTH=user:pass

You can use CRYPT=pass:password to disable communication with those
who don't know the password as this:

 % delegated -P8000 FCL=sslway CRYPT=pass:xxxx SERVER=sockmux ...
 % delegated -P9000 FSV=sslway CRYPT=pass:xxxx SERVER=sockmux://host:8000 ...

 |for the time beeing the socks authorization will do the job of course !

You can use AUTHORIZER + MYAUTH for SOCKS-DeleGate too.

  9 9   Yutaka Sato <>
 ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
_<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]